kill people
An A.I. Pioneer on What We Should Really Fear - The New York Times
Artificial intelligence stirs our highest ambitions and deepest fears like few other technologies. It's as if every gleaming and Promethean promise of machines able to perform tasks at speeds and with skills of which we can only dream carries with it a countervailing nightmare of human displacement and obsolescence. But despite recent A.I. breakthroughs in previously human-dominated realms of language and visual art -- the prose compositions of the GPT-3 language model and visual creations of the DALL-E 2 system have drawn intense interest -- our gravest concerns should probably be tempered. At least that's according to the computer scientist Yejin Choi, a 2022 recipient of the prestigious MacArthur "genius" grant who has been doing groundbreaking research on developing common sense and ethical reasoning in A.I. "There is a bit of hype around A.I. potential, as well as A.I. fear," admits Choi, who is 45. Which isn't to say the story of humans and A.I. will be without its surprises.
San Francisco supervisors bar police robots from using deadly force for now
A woman holds up a sign while taking part in a demonstration about the use of robots by the San Francisco Police Department outside of City Hall in San Francisco on Monday. A woman holds up a sign while taking part in a demonstration about the use of robots by the San Francisco Police Department outside of City Hall in San Francisco on Monday. SAN FRANCISCO -- San Francisco supervisors voted Tuesday to put the brakes on a controversial policy that would let police use robots for deadly force. The Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to explicitly ban the use of robots in such fashion for now. But they sent the issue back to a committee for further discussion and could allow it in limited cases at another time.
The Future of Artificial Intelligence
The Reviewer -- James Voorhees is a cyber analyst with General Dynamics Information Technology. He has extensive experience as an analyst and engineer working on cybersecurity, mostly for federal agencies. He holds a PhD from the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies and is the author of Dialogue Sustained: The Multilevel Peace Process and the Dartmouth Conference. BOOK REVIEW -- Artificial intelligence (AI) is all the rage these days. For some, it is a technology that promises transformative progress.
From information to I, Robot: the reality of AI ethics
But Vallor โ a leading American scholar of the ethics of data and artificial intelligence shortly to flit to Edinburgh University โ reckons we should be concerned with military robots. Because of the people who may control them. Science fiction writers have fretted for decades about the moral philosophy of smart robots. What, at least in popular culture, we have not done so much is think about the ethics of dumb humans who will suddenly have control of vast amounts of artificial intelligence. That is where thinkers like Vallor come in.
Killer robots declared 'existential human threat' by expert who fears fatal AI uprising
Dr Ian Pearson, an ex-cybernetics engineer, says our species risks a future "robot uprising". The futurologist said manufacturers who do not follow guidelines risk leaving robots to turn against us. He told Daily Star Online: "Military robots obviously would be able to kill people, but only a few. "To be an existential threat, there would need to be many millions of them that have become a threat without anyone noticing, and that seems unlikely. "Although again, it assumes a modicum of intelligence in regulation. "Robots plus online AI is a different threat.
Blockchain doesn't kill people, but smart contracts can, law professor says
By now, we should be feeling quite familiar with artificial intelligence. Science fiction has shown us what happens when robots are gifted human-like intelligence. Typically, it doesn't end well, but what about the "intelligence" of automated blockchain networks? Smart contracts, like the ones that power Ethereum's ecosystem, can be seen as a simple form of machine intelligence, and one academic is convinced we are giving them far too much responsibility. Adam Kolber, a Brooklyn Law School professor, has shared a chilling vision of a not-so-distant future, in which humans live under threat of blockchain-based overlords.
Killer robots aren't just science fiction anymore
Artificial intelligence is the future of aerospace and defence, but the chief executive of French giant Thales says there is one application of the technology that his firm will never pursue: autonomous killing machines. "It has been discussed for too long, to be honest. It's not that difficult to say no to killer robots," Patrice Caine told a group of journalists in Montreal Thursday. AI-powered lethal weapons aren't the sort of thing that most CEOs have to worry about, but Thales operates in the aerospace, transportation and defence sectors, and Caine told the Financial Post that he imagines AI will be embedded in just about every aspect of the company's business in the next five years or so. "I would say you will find some kind of AI almost everywhere," he said.
Artificial Intelligence will kill. Deal with it.
Google, while promising to "bring the benefits of AI to everyone," signed a deal with the Pentagon to use their AI technology to kill people. The outrage this caused among its employees, made Google cancel the contract. Though, at first glance, it seems like a victory for the non-violent use of AI, isn't it also quite naive? Technology firms working with the military-industrial complex is neither new or shocking. Amazon, Microsoft, and IBM are very involved without anybody paying much attention.
Opinion: There's more to the Google military AI project than we've been told
Google, a company whose motto used to be "don't be evil," has had its ethics questioned lately over its insistence on developing AI for the Pentagon. If you're among the many people who don't understand why, against the grain, the Mountain View company would risk such damage to its reputation, you're not alone. According to a report from Gizmodo, Google is getting around $9 million. Sure, for most of us that would set us up for life, but let's not forget that Google is worth nearly a trillion dollars. It can afford to skip a project that doesn't suit its ethical makeup.
How much is a human worth?
This will be the first invitational post for Hyperjumping. My friend Nuno Reis is a computer scientist with a thing for cinema and science fiction who is now exploring marketing to manipulate the minds of others (yes, he turned evil). He usually writes about the fantastic in SciFiWorld.pt, and about Technology in blog.nunoreis.pt. We hear all the time that a human life is priceless, but no one speaks about the value of humanity. Everyone is talking about the robots and Artificial Intelligences that will take our jobs, but no one is considering the jobs that will remain human forever.